ParentProof.org Independent · non-profit Ratings + alerts

Independent ratings and live alerts for everything your kid touches.

Channels, shows, brands, toys, snacks, apps, games. Parents rate them. Educators and clinicians weigh in. We watch the news so you do not have to. Then we send you exactly what you asked to know about, and nothing else.

Build my alert list → Browse what we cover 0 funders with rating influence
0
Coverage categories
0
Entities tracked
0
Disclosed funding sources
0
Council steps
Live · sample watchlist feed just now
Sample feed · illustrative Make this yours →
We rate and watch eleven categories · scroll or hover to pause
§ section 03 / 09
Browse · 01 / 04

Pick a category. Pick an entity. See what parents, educators, and clinicians actually said.

Every entity has a structured rating, a list of recent flags, and a live news strip. Subscribe to any of them for updates.

§ section 04 / 09
Alerts · 02 / 04

Tell us what to whisper in your ear.

No newsletter. No marketing. You pick the entities, the trigger types, the channel, and the frequency. We send only that.

01 Trigger types

When any of these happen for an entity on your watchlist, that is an alert. Toggle off the ones you do not care about.

02 Channel

Where alerts arrive. You can pick more than one.

03 Frequency

How often we sendDaily digest
Real-timeDailyWeeklyMonthly

04 Live preview · what you would receive today

Updates as you toggle. This is the actual format and tone we send. No marketing, no upsell.

Sample preview: 0 alerts in the last 24 hours would match your filters Estimated based on sample data
§ section 05 / 09
How ratings work · 03 / 04

Six inputs. One rating. Every input is visible.

No black-box score. Every ParentProof rating decomposes into the six inputs below, and you can audit any of them on any listing.

IN Six inputs

Weighted, normalized, audited. Any input can be inspected on the listing page itself.

Parent reviewscommunity
Educator notesadvisory
Clinical guidanceadvisory
AEGIS classificationpartner
News & recall feedweb
Channel-drift signalinternal
ParentProof Score audited

OUT What you see

One rating with breakdown. One age band. One short verdict. Plus a live news strip per listing.

Headline rating0–100, Bayesian Wilson lower bound82
Age bandrecommended viewer / user age7+
Drift indicatorchange since first rating↘ −4
Recent flagsparents · 30 days2
Verdict lineone sentence, plain English
No paid placement. Brands cannot buy a higher rating, lower rating, or removal. Auditable. Every input is timestamped and attributable on the listing page. Disputable. Any entity may dispute via the council process below.
§ section 06 / 09
Governance · 04 / 04

A board of parents, educators, and researchers.

Every named role here is filled by a real person whose background and term of service is public. While we file, the structure is published; names appear as soon as the slate is confirmed.

Chair
TBD
Term: 2026 — 2030 · convenes the board
TBD · two decades in non-profit governance and child-development research.
"Independence is a structural choice. We made it on day one."
Treasurer
TBD
Term: 2026 — 2029 · audit and financial oversight
TBD · CPA with non-profit audit experience; chairs the finance committee.
"Every dollar is documented. That is the floor, not the ceiling."
Secretary
TBD
Term: 2026 — 2028 · minutes and bylaws stewardship
TBD · former library-system administrator and parent of two.
"Public minutes are the simplest accountability tool we have."
Director-at-large
TBD
Term: 2026 — 2028
TBD · pediatric clinician focused on adolescent media use.
Director-at-large
TBD
Term: 2026 — 2029
TBD · K–12 educator and curriculum designer.
Director-at-large
TBD
Term: 2026 — 2030
TBD · researcher in media studies and children's media policy.
All board members serve staggered terms. No single director may serve more than 8 years total. Board meets quarterly. Minutes published at /transparency. Full bylaws at /governance.
§ section 07 / 09
Funding

Where our money actually comes from.

All funding sources are public. The rule is that no funder can influence ratings, recommendations, alerts, or directory content. Dollar amounts publish with the first audited annual report.

Funding mix · current fiscal year
Cash sources Non-cash contributions (fair-value disclosed)
Bylaw · enforced by the ED

The independence rule

No funder, donor, sponsor, or partner may influence individual listing decisions, the classification engine, the community council, alerts, or editorial direction. This rule is written into the bylaws and enforced by the Executive Director under oversight of the Board. Violations trigger a public reporting requirement within 30 days.

Non-cash technology partnership

The AEGIS technology partnership

AEGIS is licensed to ParentProof at no cost to the non-profit under a disclosed technology agreement. The provider has no role in governance, no board seat, no say in directory content, and no access to community member data. Reviewed annually by the Board.

Seed-stage non-cash support

Founding support

ParentProof.org received one-time seed-stage non-cash support during formation. The support source has no ongoing governance role, no board seat, and no operational control. The contribution is disclosed as legal, hosting, and early organizational support.

Independence

How we are related, and how we stay independent.

The honest answer is: we are related to a commercial classification company. Here is the full shape, in five parts.

01 What AEGIS support is

AEGIS is a licensed classification input used by ParentProof as one part of its disclosed evaluation stack. It supports structured analysis, but it is not the rating, and it does not override community judgment.

02 What founding support is

ParentProof.org received one-time seed-stage non-cash support for legal formation, initial hosting, and early organizational effort. That support created no ongoing governance role.

03 Why ParentProof is a separate non-profit

Content classification has a credibility problem when it is wholly commercial. A parent-facing product run by the same commercial entity that licenses classification to platforms has an obvious conflict. ParentProof was structured as a separate non-profit from day one to hold the parent surface independently, with its own governance, funding, and accountability.

04 What that looks like in practice

ParentProof.org has its own board, staff, budget, and decisions. The AEGIS technology provider contributes under the non-cash partnership described above. The provider does not have a board seat, does not see community data, does not influence listing decisions, and does not dictate editorial direction. The relationship is contractual, disclosed, reviewed annually, and reversible.

05 How to verify any of this

The bylaws are public. The board is public. The technology-partnership agreement is summarized publicly (redactions for commercial terms only; governance terms are unredacted). Annual reports document all funding flows. Community council meetings are open. Anyone with a question about independence can email [email protected] and expect a substantive response within a week.

The community council

Disputes, escalations, and the final word on hard cases.

Most listings are straightforward. Hard cases — a brand contesting a flag, a channel-drift call, a recall judgment — go to the community council. Here is how that works, end to end.

Council process · 6 stages · click any step
Monthly council meetings are open. Next meeting: TBD. Observer links and minutes at /transparency/meetings.
Transparency

Reports, decisions, and meeting notes.

Everything a reasonable funder, journalist, or parent would want to read is indexed here. Nothing buried.

All materials here are public. Nothing is paywalled. If something you want is not visible, email [email protected].
Participate

Three ways to show up.

No sign-up flow. No newsletter. Pick the path that matches what you can give: money, time, or a seat at the table.

02 · Time

Volunteer as a reviewer

Help classify, moderate, and maintain listing quality across all eleven coverage categories. Reviewers are the backbone of the directory. Active reviewers earn eligibility to stand for the community council.

Volunteers commit roughly 2–4 hours per month. Training is provided. Background-check steps for certain review categories are documented in onboarding as those review lanes come online.
03 · A seat at the table

Stand for the community council

The council handles disputes and sets editorial standards across categories. Members serve 2-year terms. Nominations open annually and are open to any active reviewer in good standing.

Eligibility: open to any active reviewer in good standing for at least 6 months. Council members must complete a brief governance orientation.
Contact

Who to actually email.

Three addresses, three purposes. We answer real mail from real people.

General questions and routine partnership inquiries. Response target: 5 business days.
Journalists, researchers. Response target: 3 business days. Press kit and board-member media availability on request.
Questions about independence, funding, governance, or disclosed partnerships. Goes to the Executive Director with a one-week substantive-response target.